Before I jump into the post, I’d like to address some recent chatter regarding Hillman and Moore. Coming into this season I was a pretty big fan of Moore and very skeptical about Hillman. At this point in time, I am getting very nervous about Moore and I’m completely done with Hillman (as you all know I have been for a while). It doesn’t matter that I never played beyond high school ball – Trey Hillman is a moron. It’s extremely evident that this is true. All you have to do is listen to that numnuts talk.
What a complete and utter joke. I mean that with all my heart (to steal a sappy line from Dayton Moore’s recent “I have faith in my process” article). My concerns with Dayton Moore can probably be summed up with this quote from the Star:
“We’re going to keep the group we have, and we’re going to work. That’s the only way I know how to do it. It might not be the right way, but it’s the only way I know how to do it.”
So much for adapting on the job... We are 19-46 since our nice 18-11 start (small sample size). People like to point to last September (“a run for the ages” – CABG) or this April as “proof” that Hillman is a good manager or that our team is good. My explanation for those two months: Even a blind squirrel finds a nut. I agree with Dayton that we don’t need a massive overhaul and I’m not calling for that. But I certainly don’t agree with “do nothing and hope/wait for it to get better” approach either. Ugh, what a depressing situation we’re in – though it’s nothing new. By the way, we should trade Joakim Soria right now because we obviously don’t know what to do with an elite reliever. On to the post…
Stat guy vs. baseball guy has been quite the topic at the ol’ Bullpen Boys these days. I think a post is definitely called for at this point. If you read the comments section (If you don’t do this, I highly recommend you do as it is a great gathering place for the wide spectrum of Royals fans) then you know that there has been some debate over stats vs. the little things.
I'd like to clarify something. I myself have never attacked any of the following: 1. The little things 2. Hustle 3. Grinders 4. Team cohesiveness 5. Knob location
All I've done is staunchly defend the attacks on stats.
Baseball is my favorite thing in life (sad) and there is no way I could be this perverse about the game without loving and respecting the hell out of the "little things". Those are the things I look for when I’m watching games on TV or out at the ballpark. I love watching the guy in the on deck circle to see how he prepares. I like to see which players hop over the foul line on their way to and from the dugout and which guys could care less about that superstition. I love watching SS and 2B play “daylight” with a runner on 2nd to limit his leadoff. Turning two is probably my favorite play in the game and there is nothing prettier than a smooth turn at the bag. I could go on for hours. All of these little things are very important to winning a baseball game. I fully agree with that. I enjoy all of these things, but I also enjoy WINNING. Something the Royals haven’t done in 24 years. I’m 25. That is pathetic. You see I agree that you need players who grind it out and do all the little things, but if you want to win – you need guys to get ON BASE. In my opinion,OBP is the most imortant statistic in baseball. Even old school Earl Weaver knows that (read this article, long read, but well worth it). Ok, let’s talk shop…
First off, let’s get a little more detail about OPS. OPS stands for On base % Plus Slugging %. OBP = (H+BB+HBP)/(AB+BB+HBP+SF) SLUG = (Total Bases)/(AB) It is a way to quantify a players ability to get on base AND their ability to hit for power. I must say upfront that OPS gives a little more weight to slugging% (contrary to claims in the comment section). The AL average this year for OBP is .335; SLUG is .427 – therefore average OPS is 762. There is more variance (range) in the SLUG because the mean (average) is higher. This means that the difference between the top 10 in SLUG vs. league average is a greater number than the difference between the top 10 in OBP vs. league average – make sense? This means that OPS stat will give a little extra bump to the exceptional SLUG hitters more than the exceptional OBP hitters. Let’s take the SLUG and OBP leaders in the AL from 2008 and assume that they would be league average in the other category. A-Rod had a SLUG of .573 (146 pts above avg) and Milton Bradley (yes, the same guy) had an OBP of .436 (101 points above avg). So, you can see that there is more “room” in the SLUG department.
Now, because this stat combines two stats (and leans towards SLUG) it may not be fair to certain players. Let’s take SS for example. A lot of shortstops don’t hit for much power, so even if they do a good job of getting on base, their OPS will trend lower. Let’s take a “gamer” type player (David Eckstein) who does all the little things right. He may be the ultimate gamer who does crazy hustle things like sprint to first when he draws a walk (Cabby just got a semi). In 2005, David Eckstein had an OPS of .758 which was below league average. However, his OBP was .363 – well above average. So David Eckstein had a very good year for a SS who doesn’t bat in the middle of the order. This is a good example of not blindly following OPS as the end all be all (as I've been accused of doing). That is my disclaimer as I sit here and praise OPS. OPS is used for impact bats (like Gordon and Butler) and that is what the Royals desperately need.
Great baseball minds marginally smarter than I have poured through all the stats in the game and have found that this is one of the best measurements to define a well rounded player. This stat has forced intuitive sports fans to trend away from the measurements we used on the back of baseball cards and look more closely at these stats with PROVEN success. Let’s play a couple games, shall we…
The following two players are from the 2008 season. Both put together nice seasons, but which player would you rather have?
Player A:
Runs: 100
HR: 37
RBI: 116
Runs+RBI: 216
Player B:
Runs: 101
HR: 36
RBI: 119
Runs+RBI: 220
If you are in the belief that Runs and RBI are the most important stats, then you would pick player B. Sure the two players above are close, but you might as well pick the one with higher Runs & RBI because those are really the “only two stats that matter” Congratulations, you just picked Adrian Gonzalez over Albert Pujols. In 2008, Albert Pujols put together one of the most dominating seasons in the past 10 years. But how you ask? He had less Runs and RBI’s than Adrian Gonzalez, so how was his season so dominating? If Albert had better hitters behind him, he probably would’ve scored another 20-30 runs. If Albert had better OBP guys ahead of him getting on base, he probably could’ve driven in 30-40 more runs. You see runs and RBI depend on the guys before and after you. But OPS has to do with only one person’s performance: the person in the box. Ok, now let’s look at some new and improved stats to go along with these “old school” stats.
Player A: OBP: .462; SLUG: .653; OPS: 1.114
Player B: OBP: .361; SLUG: .510; OPS: .871
You see Albert got on base at a rate 100 points (10%) higher than Adrian Gonzalez. Basically, every month that season, Albert would get on base 10 more times than Adrian. In that same month, Albert would get 14 more total bases than Adrian. So, even if they had the same amount of hits per month, maybe Albert hit 14 more doubles, or maybe 7 more triples, or how about 4 HR’s and 2 doubles. As you can see, Albert was a much, much better hitter than Adrian last year. There are no if’s, and’s, or but’s about it. It is clear as day. But if all you saw were Runs, HR’s, and RBI’s, you wouldn’t be able to tell the difference!
Next example, from the 2005 season…
Player A:
RBI: 101
BA: .247
Player B:
RBI: 117
BA: .286
Again, if I’m looking at these two players and I’m a “baseball” guy, I’m gonna take player B here because he clearly delivered more with guys on base. He also hit 40 points higher in regards to batting average, so he definitely is doing a better job of getting on base and moving guys around, right? Wrong.
Player A: OBP: .387; OPS: .927
Player B: OBP: .311; OPS: .808
You see Jorge Cantu (Player B) got on base 196 times that season. Sure he drove in 117 runs and had a pretty good season, but batting average doesn’t tell the whole story. Adam Dunn (Player B) got on base 260 times that season! The only reason Dunn has less RBI’s than Cantu is because pitchers pitch around him all the time when guys are on base. Though it limits his RBI opportunities, he takes a walk and prolongs the inning and leads to creating more runs. It’s a no brainer who to choose if you had to pick between Dunn and Cantu.
Final example, also from the 2005 season…
Player A:
Runs: 95
RBI: 128
Player B:
Runs: 95
RBI: 108
Player A is cleary better at driving runners in as he drove in 20 more runs than Player B, right? Wrong
Player A: Base runners during AB’s – 503; RBI % - 15.31%
Player A: Base runners during AB’s – 378; RBI % - 20.11%
RBI % is calculated by dividing the number of runners you drove in by the number of runners you had on base. It also removes the RBI's where a player drives himself in (HR's). You see Andruw Jones (Player A) drove in a lot of runs that year, but he also had 503 guys on base throughout his season. Of the 503 guys on base he only drove in 77 of them. Vladimir Guerrero (Player B) drove in 76 base runners that same year and did it with 125 less runners than Jones! If he were given the same amount of base runners as Jones and kept his RBI % the same, he would’ve driven in 101 runners compared to 77. If you were a manager and you could choose between having Vlad or Jones up to bat with runners on base, who are you picking?
Ok, so I hope those examples help show why OPS and other advanced stats are important and why Bill James is on to something here. I wish Earl Weaver would come out of retirement and take the reigns from Hillman. Seriously – read that article.
Hey Hatt, where we at?- offensive line edition
15 hours ago